STATE

Texas House approves bill to arrest, deport people suspected of illegally entering US

Hogan Gore
Austin American-Statesman

The Texas House has approved Senate Bill 4 — a proposal to create new state penalties for people who illegally cross into Texas through the state's southern border and that allows magistrate judges to order those accused of illegally entering the U.S. to return to Mexico or face prosecution.

The House on Tuesday night passed the bill — which has been debated several times in both legislative chambers in recent weeks — by an 83-61 party line vote despite opposition from Democratic lawmakers and rights advocates over concerns the legislation is too broad and it could potentially affect everyday Texans through the state's attempt at immigration enforcement.

"Senate Bill 4 is the broadest, most invasive piece of legislation to ever potentially challenge the very nature of our federal and state power," said Rep. Victoria Neave Criado, D-Dallas, during the debate over the bill on the House floor Tuesday. "The power to enforce immigration is unquestionably exclusively a federal power."

SB 4 would require people accused of illegally crossing the state's southern border outside of a port of entry to accept a magistrate judge's order to return to Mexico or face prosecution, with possible penalties ranging from a Class A misdemeanor to a second-degree felony.

"My task is to get this bill out of here and on the governor's desk as soon as possible," Rep. David Spiller, R-Jacksboro, said of Senate Bill 4.

Rep. David Spiller, R-Jacksboro, who sponsored the bill by Sen. Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, which advanced to the lower chamber after a late-night Senate session last week, defended the legislation as necessary to address the immigration crisis at the border.

Spiller, who rejected two dozen proposed amendments, said he felt it was important to advance the bill without any changes from the Senate version to not delay it getting to Gov. Greg Abbott to sign into law.

"My task is to get this bill out of here and on the governor's desk as soon as possible," Spiller said. "Because if I'm wasting my time and know that it's going to be a delay, I'm going to have trouble sleeping tonight."

On Wednesday, Abbott signaled his intent to sign the bill into law, calling the legislation "historic progress." He and Lt. Gov Dan Patrick congratulated and thanked Spiller and the House for passing the bill, calling it the one of the strongest border security proposals ever passed in Texas.

"SB 4 will require criminal background checks and the collection of fingerprints and photographs of those arrested for crossing the border illegally," Patrick said in a statement on X, formerly Twitter. "The illegal crosser can be jailed or ordered by a magistrate to be returned to the border. If they violate the order and return to Texas, they will face even harsher penalties."

Opponents of SB 4 argue the legislation is an affront to federal law, gives nonfederal law enforcement officers broad permission to arrest and deport those living in the state who might be accused of having illegally crossed the border, and is an invasion into the lives of the state's Hispanic and migrant communities.

More:Texas House gives OK to $1.54 billion border wall construction bill

Neave Criado, who chairs the House Mexican American Legislative Caucus, argued that the bill is a political avenue to challenge U.S. Supreme Court precedent on immigration law.

"SB 4 intends to challenge the decadelong holding of Arizona vs. United States given the new makeup of the U.S. Supreme Court," Neave Criado said.

"Senate Bill 4 is the broadest, most invasive piece of legislation to ever potentially challenge the very nature of our federal and state power," said Rep. Victoria Neave Criado, D-Dallas.

Around 6:15 p.m. Tuesday, after more than 6 hours of debate, Rep. Jared Patterson, R-Frisco, made a parliamentary motion to cut discussion on the bill, allowing the legislation to jump forward to its first vote by the full House.

"This is the same bill that we debated until 4 a.m. just a couple of weeks ago," Patterson said before the motion was approved along party lines. "Hours and hours and hours of debate on a bill that is critically important to the future of the state."

Neave Criado, who argued against ending debate on the bill, said: "We won't be able to have an opportunity to lay out amendments because you're cutting off our time. You're cutting off our hands; you're cutting off our feet; you're trying to silence our voices."

After the House moved the bill forward with an initial vote Tuesday, the members then paused and began a new legislative day, allowing the chamber to take a second and final vote on SB 4 that night and advancing it to Abbott to sign into law.

Using the same parliamentary procedure, House members also passed SB 3 — a $1.54 billion proposal to build 50 miles of state border wall — though the Senate will have to sign off on the lower chamber's version of the bill.

Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, tried to add an amendment to SB 4 to allow an undocumented person to be exempt from arrest while attending a medical treatment or a forensics exam with a family member.

'Inaccurate arrests may occur'

Despite SB 4 carving out certain locations where law enforcement officers could not target people believed to have illegally entered the country — including in schools, churches, hospitals and facilities that provide forensic medical examinations for sexual assault survivors — Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, tried to codify an amendment to allow an undocumented person to be exempt from arrest while attending a medical treatment or a forensics exam with a family member.

"This is going to prevent people from getting the forensic exam because their family member cannot be there with them, and that is a horrific thing to have to go through," Howard said before her amendment was rejected along party lines. "We're willing to send a bill that has this damaging impact without considering adding this amendment, even if it means it delays things a bit. I can't quite understand that."

Rep. Salman Bhojani, D-Euless, in a last-ditch effort to limit the bill's authority, asked lawmakers to include an amendment to require peace officers to verify a person's immigration status before making an arrest. He said that without that amendment, the onus is on everyday Texans to prove they belong in the country as opposed to law enforcement officers having the burden to prove that there has been an offense.

"Without proper verification of an individual's legal status, inaccurate arrests may occur," Rep. Salman Bhojani, D-Euless, said of concerns that SB 4 might lead to racial profiling. "I would hate to penalize anyone who has followed our laws and has done everything right."

The amendment, which Bhojani said was needed to avoid possible instances of racial profiling, failed along party lines with Democrats proposing several changes to the bill before it was finally passed.

"Without proper verification of an individual's legal status, inaccurate arrests may occur," Bhojani said. "I would hate to penalize anyone who has followed our laws and has done everything right."

In closing arguments, many Democrats rose to plead against the bill. Rep. Joe Moody, D-El Paso, reflecting on the many immigration and border fights during his tenure, said Tuesday night's vote weighed heavily on him and communities across Texas.

"Members, I've walked off this floor defeated many times," Moody said. "And I was telling myself and others around me that I have enough hope to keep fighting, and I'm going to try to tell myself that tonight; I don't know if I believe it."